|
Community Links |
Pictures & Albums |
Members List |
Search Forums |
Tag Search |
Advanced Search |
Go to Page... |
View Poll Results: Will You Subscribe and Why? | |||
Yes, because I like the idea |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
7 | 23.33% |
Yes, even though I hate the idea I don't want to miss out |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
2 | 6.67% |
No, even though I like the Idea I don't have the income |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
6 | 20.00% |
No, because I hate the idea |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
15 | 50.00% |
Voters: 30. You may not vote on this poll |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools |
![]() |
#51 |
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 697
|
Quote:
What they should do, is wait to see what happens. I'd say there's a very good chance they're not hitting their 100% mark. So instead of Mattel saying "Well no one wants it, let's give up then." They should ask the fans what they want. Such as better prices and/or more accessories, and a way to opt out a few figures if wanted. If they offered that, I for one would probably be for the club.
Whether true or not, I guarantee you that will be the "lesson learned" and you can enjoy your endless repetitions of the same core characters over and over again in the "new" DC line late next year. The idea of the fans dictating virtually every detail of the subscription to Mattel ("Lower Prices! More Accessories! Let us Skip figures!") is laughable. They still have to make money on these figures, and the "locked in" nature of the subscription exists solely to make sure that they can afford to make the line at all. They're not a nonprofit organization designed to give you exactly what you want at a loss. They could've just said "Screw it, no more DCUC" but instead they at least gave it a chance. You REALLY think they're going to make characters "NO ONE" wants on the subscription? For all the bitching on their forums, most sane people seem to be pretty pleased with how they've handled DCUC and MotUC in terms of character selections. Are they going to hit a "home run" every time? No, but that's just as unrealistic an expectation as believing they're going to just crank out a bunch of figures that nobody wants or asked for. If the majority speaks and the sub doesn't go through...oh well. Money saved. I just don't want to hear the people who are naysaying now bitching about Mattel's character selections late next year after the line is "rebranded" and "classic" is really not part of the equation anymore. When it becomes a FAR more "core character based" line. Oh and PS: They're removing the build-a-figure from the retail line, too, but I'm willing to bet they don't lower prices. Last edited by Jmacq1; 07-29-2011 at 04:18 AM.. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#52 |
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 158
|
If this fails I don't think they will drop the line. I think it's a marketing thing. They will just go back to the drawing board and go hmm how can we make our sales better
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#53 |
Guardian of Gotham
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Newmarket, ONT
Posts: 728
|
Increasing distribution to places like Canada and bettering the distribution in the US would be a nice place to start if you ask me.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#54 |
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 697
|
Quote:
Time-Warner is pushing this DC Reboot thing extremely hard, and they want their licensors to fall in line and make sure they're pushing the "right" product on mass-retail shelves. That doesn't include the kind of product that DCUC represents anymore. Now, they HAVE said that the new line will not be entirely "New DC Universe" product. However they have confirmed that they're no longer doing "themed waves" and that build-a-figures are no longer happening (another reason to support the subscription if you want any larger-than-average characters). Every sign points towards DCUC becoming a largely "New DC" and "core character" based line moving forward. If you want to complete any team besides maybe the JLA, you're probably out of luck, particularly if they're not part of the "new" DC Universe (such as the JSA and "classic" Teen Titans). |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#55 |
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 470
|
Well, regardless, I'd be happy to pick up the new "no-more-underpants-on-the-outside" Supes & Bats, along with the Savage Hawkman (who, in my opinion, looks awesome!). May get Wonder Woman as well, but I really prefer her #600/#601-onwards costume to her "Relaunch" version.
Anyway, the thermometer seems to actually be at 20% instead of under, but things still don't look well. I'm subscribing, but actually can't until August 4th, 'cause that's when I receive my paycheck, and I've no money at this moment. So the "day before" it is - for me. Oh, and why is it that it always seems that no matter what the industry, (be it toys, games, etc.) Canada constantly seems to get the very, very short end of the stick. I'm a US citizen myself, but what the heck! It's absolutely unfair seeing the things I see all the time regarding Canada. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#56 |
WINGNUT & SCREWLOOSE!
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Dallas
Posts: 2,172
|
Quote:
I think a DCUC collector's club is a pretty cool idea in theory, but the thing is I think Mattel's really grilling us for money here it really pisses me off. From 2007 to 2009, the price of figures nearly doubled from $8 to $15 while Transformers on the other hand - a line that has very complicated designs with most figures having unique sculpts - only had a price increase of $2. I just hope Hasbro's new ML figures aren't going to cost me an arm and a leg like Mattel's figures.
So your TF comparison really doesn't hold water at all. Also, I've never seen a DCUC sold for $8, ever. Not unless it was on sale, clearance, or misspriced. The lowest I've ever seen them, from when the line began was $12. So $12 to $15 is not an unreasonable jump, honestly.
__________________
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#57 |
You Can't Ignore My Girth
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Vancouver Island, Canada
Posts: 2,032
|
Quote:
Quote:
No, if the club fails to take off, the only conclusion Mattel is going to come to is that clearly collector support for DCUC is not strong. Their bark is worse than their bite and they don't put their money where their mouth is.
Whether true or not, I guarantee you that will be the "lesson learned" and you can enjoy your endless repetitions of the same core characters over and over again in the "new" DC line late next year. The idea of the fans dictating virtually every detail of the subscription to Mattel ("Lower Prices! More Accessories! Let us Skip figures!") is laughable. They still have to make money on these figures, and the "locked in" nature of the subscription exists solely to make sure that they can afford to make the line at all. They're not a nonprofit organization designed to give you exactly what you want at a loss. They could've just said "Screw it, no more DCUC" but instead they at least gave it a chance. You REALLY think they're going to make characters "NO ONE" wants on the subscription? For all the bitching on their forums, most sane people seem to be pretty pleased with how they've handled DCUC and MotUC in terms of character selections. Are they going to hit a "home run" every time? No, but that's just as unrealistic an expectation as believing they're going to just crank out a bunch of figures that nobody wants or asked for. If the majority speaks and the sub doesn't go through...oh well. Money saved. I just don't want to hear the people who are naysaying now bitching about Mattel's character selections late next year after the line is "rebranded" and "classic" is really not part of the equation anymore. When it becomes a FAR more "core character based" line. Oh and PS: They're removing the build-a-figure from the retail line, too, but I'm willing to bet they don't lower prices. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#58 |
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 470
|
Quote:
The thing is, Transformers sells waaaaaaay more units than DCUC does, so it's really not that fair a comparison to make. Also, Hasbro (I believe specifically the TF team) has fought for years to keep the TF prices stable. The deluxes remained at $10 from when the pricepoint was introduced in 1995, all the way until just before Revenge of the Fallen. In that same time, the price of basics went from $5, to almost $10. Leaders have jumped from $35 to nearly $50 now. Modern Ultras have gone from $25 to nearly $35. Voyagers have gone from $20 to $25.
So your TF comparison really doesn't hold water at all. Also, I've never seen a DCUC sold for $8, ever. Not unless it was on sale, clearance, or misspriced. The lowest I've ever seen them, from when the line began was $12. So $12 to $15 is not an unreasonable jump, honestly. ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#59 |
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 697
|
The only semi-realistic suggestion you had was "more accessories." You're excused though. You're hardly the only collector that has an unrealistic view of how these sorts of things work.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#60 |
Etherian Panty Inspector
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: the Frozen North
Posts: 2,156
|
No doubt. I was a hardcore collector of DC Infinite Heroes and still collect Mattel's WWE Legends but by the time Martian Manhunter, Speedy and Ted Kord finally hit our shelves, I stopped caring. I would've loved to buy the Doomsday boxset at retail but it was never there so I bought it online for some ripoff price and then I saw it at Winners for $8.99. Their Canadian distro is weak. We still only have wave 2 of the WWE Legends here and they're already up to wave 6. WAVE 6, PEOPLE! And they wonder why they aren't moving product? And it doesn't seem to help that someone's idea of replenishing inventory when a miracle occurs and they actually sell all of the WWE Legends Wave 2 figures is to get MORE Wave 2 figures.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#61 |
You Can't Ignore My Girth
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Vancouver Island, Canada
Posts: 2,032
|
I hardly believe any of the suggestions I, and others, have made are unrealistic. The way to opt out a few figures is realistic, if anything, it's also smart. People will be more appealed to the fact they won't be forced to get a figure they don't want. Making figures cheaper is fair, especially with the fact that with the 3 figures they have announced so far only ONE comes with ONE accessory. OR, if they don't want to make figures cheaper, offer more accessories. It's quite simple, get your moneys worth. So either pay cheaper for accessory-less figures or pay what they're asking now for plentiful accessory figures. That's hardly unrealistic, that's fair. If Mattel doesn't want to do anything about this, they're greedy and don't deserve as much business and attention they're getting right now.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#62 |
collects lots of stuff.
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Albuquerque, NM
Posts: 53
|
The current list of confirmed figures for the sub is:
Red Lantern Atrocitus Jay Garrick Flash Starman from LOSH Poison Ivy( ![]()
__________________
I collect lots of stuff (at this moment my wallet screamed). |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#63 |
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 697
|
Quote:
I hardly believe any of the suggestions I, and others, have made are unrealistic. The way to opt out a few figures is realistic, if anything, it's also smart. People will be more appealed to the fact they won't be forced to get a figure they don't want. Making figures cheaper is fair, especially with the fact that with the 3 figures they have announced so far only ONE comes with ONE accessory. OR, if they don't want to make figures cheaper, offer more accessories. It's quite simple, get your moneys worth. So either pay cheaper for accessory-less figures or pay what they're asking now for plentiful accessory figures. That's hardly unrealistic, that's fair. If Mattel doesn't want to do anything about this, they're greedy and don't deserve as much business and attention they're getting right now.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#64 |
The Collector
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 93
|
shit there toys are complete shit!
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#65 |
You Can't Ignore My Girth
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Vancouver Island, Canada
Posts: 2,032
|
Then give more accessories. Did I not say that if they can't lower the prices just give us more accessories?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#66 |
WINGNUT & SCREWLOOSE!
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Dallas
Posts: 2,172
|
Technically, more accessories means more plastic, developement, and materials. They have to make molds, they have to sculpt accessories, just like they have to sculpt the figures. Plus, the prices keep going up because of the cost of plastic.
ADDING more plastic, by way of accessories is not going to do anything more than raise the price further. It'll be more obvious with these, than with the line at retail. Because at retail, they can balance out a heavy figure (Heavy by being larger, or by having more accessories such as Deathstroke) by including a smaller figure like Carol Farris into the same wave. Though, Mattel seems to use this more with the C&C figures (Including the biggest pieces with the smallest figure... Gorilla Grodd's torso with Harley Quinn) for example. But point being, including more accessories is not going to be free. If anything, the additional plastic (Even if they reuse existing accessory molds, as opposed to making new ones) will make the figure *more* expensive.
__________________
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#67 |
Guardian of Gotham
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Newmarket, ONT
Posts: 728
|
In any case, I don't think Mattel is going to reach their quotta before this Friday. They're only at like 25%.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#68 |
You Can't Ignore My Girth
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Vancouver Island, Canada
Posts: 2,032
|
Quote:
Technically, more accessories means more plastic, developement, and materials. They have to make molds, they have to sculpt accessories, just like they have to sculpt the figures. Plus, the prices keep going up because of the cost of plastic.
ADDING more plastic, by way of accessories is not going to do anything more than raise the price further. It'll be more obvious with these, than with the line at retail. Because at retail, they can balance out a heavy figure (Heavy by being larger, or by having more accessories such as Deathstroke) by including a smaller figure like Carol Farris into the same wave. Though, Mattel seems to use this more with the C&C figures (Including the biggest pieces with the smallest figure... Gorilla Grodd's torso with Harley Quinn) for example. But point being, including more accessories is not going to be free. If anything, the additional plastic (Even if they reuse existing accessory molds, as opposed to making new ones) will make the figure *more* expensive. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#69 |
WINGNUT & SCREWLOOSE!
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Dallas
Posts: 2,172
|
I understand the point you're trying to get across, so we're all good there.
And I'd say that makes sense if it's a retail line (I've felt it was the C&C pieces that kept the accessories few and far between). However, these figures as evedent by their price are not being produced in the same quantities as a retail wave, which has a pretty big effect in driving up the price as well. So it's not quite the same thing as dropping a Kiloleg, and adding a few guns. This part here is just opinion, and has nothing to do much. I'm certainly not against accessories, and I don't mind them (Although most end up in a ziplock baggy to keep from getting lost), but the DCUC to date has never been like the JLU, or IH lines. Those were completely lacking in any and all accessories. Characters not getting accessories that are critical to their gimmick (Like JLU Green Arrow not even getting his bow). DCUC however has never been stingy with accessories when they fit the character (Save for the Lanterns rarily getting constructs, and even those have gotten a little better since the Kilowog wave). When a character is released that has key accessories, they get them. GA got his bow, and a few arrows. Indigo Atom and Stargirl get their staffs. Wonder Woman got a shield and axe, even though she's not really known for them. Batman almost always gets some accessory ot three. Deathstroke was armed to the ever-lovin' teeth. However.. what do you put in with Jay Garrick? Or Superman? Or Hawk and Dove? Plenty of DC characters really aren't known for much, and I'm honestly at a loss for ideas of accessories to include with them, that make sense. Looking at the Young Justice figures at Target today, and Kid Flash? He came with a bag of fast food. That was his only accessory that I noted (Aside from the C&C piece, which I feel is the reason those are so expensive, which no one takes into account when bitching about the price for them). So, I ask you in all honesty. If they did include a lot of new accessories, since they're $20, and no longer have a C&C piece... what exactly would you suggest putting with Starman?
__________________
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#70 |
You Can't Ignore My Girth
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Vancouver Island, Canada
Posts: 2,032
|
Quote:
I understand the point you're trying to get across, so we're all good there.
And I'd say that makes sense if it's a retail line (I've felt it was the C&C pieces that kept the accessories few and far between). However, these figures as evedent by their price are not being produced in the same quantities as a retail wave, which has a pretty big effect in driving up the price as well. So it's not quite the same thing as dropping a Kiloleg, and adding a few guns. This part here is just opinion, and has nothing to do much. I'm certainly not against accessories, and I don't mind them (Although most end up in a ziplock baggy to keep from getting lost), but the DCUC to date has never been like the JLU, or IH lines. Those were completely lacking in any and all accessories. Characters not getting accessories that are critical to their gimmick (Like JLU Green Arrow not even getting his bow). DCUC however has never been stingy with accessories when they fit the character (Save for the Lanterns rarily getting constructs, and even those have gotten a little better since the Kilowog wave). When a character is released that has key accessories, they get them. GA got his bow, and a few arrows. Indigo Atom and Stargirl get their staffs. Wonder Woman got a shield and axe, even though she's not really known for them. Batman almost always gets some accessory ot three. Deathstroke was armed to the ever-lovin' teeth. However.. what do you put in with Jay Garrick? Or Superman? Or Hawk and Dove? Plenty of DC characters really aren't known for much, and I'm honestly at a loss for ideas of accessories to include with them, that make sense. Looking at the Young Justice figures at Target today, and Kid Flash? He came with a bag of fast food. That was his only accessory that I noted (Aside from the C&C piece, which I feel is the reason those are so expensive, which no one takes into account when bitching about the price for them). So, I ask you in all honesty. If they did include a lot of new accessories, since they're $20, and no longer have a C&C piece... what exactly would you suggest putting with Starman? Last edited by M3T4L V1KING; 08-02-2011 at 06:12 PM.. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#71 |
WINGNUT & SCREWLOOSE!
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Dallas
Posts: 2,172
|
Quote:
Right off the bat I'm going to say the first paragraph is a very good point. And to answer your question, I'd say for Starman they could have a maskless interchangeable head. Like the Dc Direct version here.
But I still don't think many figures offer a lot of accessory options, additional heads aside. What I would like, and I think they *SHOULD* do is start including figure stands. Especially since they no longer sell them anymore.
__________________
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#72 |
You Can't Ignore My Girth
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Vancouver Island, Canada
Posts: 2,032
|
Quote:
Okay, that's a decent suggestion, and not without precidence anylonger, since we've now gotten three additional lanterns than we normally would have, that way.
But I still don't think many figures offer a lot of accessory options, additional heads aside. What I would like, and I think they *SHOULD* do is start including figure stands. Especially since they no longer sell them anymore. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#73 |
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 697
|
The regular-sized figures are $15, not $20. Shipping is a separate cost that cannot be included in the price of the product itself if you're going to have an intellectually honest debate on the subject.
So basically what's happened is: The figures stayed the same price despite what would presumably be a smaller production run, at the expense of coming with a build-a-figure piece. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#74 |
You Can't Ignore My Girth
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Vancouver Island, Canada
Posts: 2,032
|
Quote:
The regular-sized figures are $15, not $20. Shipping is a separate cost that cannot be included in the price of the product itself if you're going to have an intellectually honest debate on the subject.
So basically what's happened is: The figures stayed the same price despite what would presumably be a smaller production run, at the expense of coming with a build-a-figure piece. I understand you're referring to the product itself. True, on the site it is 15$. I understand that. But you're still paying over 20$ for the figure because of shipping. You're still paying a high amount of money for an accessoryless figure. Last edited by M3T4L V1KING; 08-03-2011 at 10:45 AM.. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#75 |
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 51
|
This was posted today on Matty's Facebook page on the MOTU Q&A
''Additionally, in 2012 we will be reducing our production of all figures above and beyond the subs. We will still have product on sale day for those who do not have a sub, but in general there will be a bit less. Your first, best and most reliable way of getting the figures you want is to sign up for the sub'" This is a line that sales out in 15 min.s or less each sales day on 80% of the figures they put up. It's not like they make so many that they last days or are left with stock. And yet they refuse to UP production. This is just a scare tatic to sell subs and many refused to be bullied out of our money just for the HOPE of what MAY be made. As I said my friend is a big MOTU fan and refuses to get a sub. Why? He enjoys the original MOTU, yet they throw in Princess of Power, The New Adv., or some "never in figure forbefore". That is what scares me, they get our money and the make anyone that had ever been on Superfriends/Super Powers. There is two so far I really want BUT that's not enough to gamble over $200 on. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Tags |
dcuc, mattel, subscription ![]() |
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Marvel Universe 2011/2012 Wishlist. | break24er | Marvel Toys Discussion | 141 | 06-14-2013 09:33 AM |
First Look at Mattel's 2012 Voltron Club Lion | Deefuzz | Toy and Action Figure News and Rumors | 11 | 07-21-2011 10:56 PM |
Mattel subscription details and exclusives | T16skyhopp | Toy and Action Figure News and Rumors | 2 | 07-20-2011 01:02 PM |
Marvel Digital Subscription Archangel | Tarquinius | Marvel Toys Discussion | 15 | 10-19-2010 06:43 AM |
2011 Club Eternia Subscription Announced | Evantainment | Toy and Action Figure General Discussion | 5 | 09-04-2010 02:43 PM |
|
|
Latest Marvel Discussion |
New Marvel Legends/6" Appreciation Thread |
New Marvel 3.75" Appreciation Thread |
The Marvel Universe/3.75 Compatability Thread |
Latest Customs and Fan Art |
Game of death bruce lee |
DC Creature Commandos The Bride 7" |
XMen |
Custom Avengers |
DC The Creeper - ML Style Custom |
Latest Collection Pics |
My Mixed Collection |
Spastic for Plastic |
My Rotating Figure Display |
My Collection/Office Display |
Latest B/S/T |
Green ranger helmet for trade in central California |