|
Community Links |
Pictures & Albums |
Members List |
Search Forums |
Tag Search |
Advanced Search |
Go to Page... |
![]() |
Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
Your dismissal of storylines seems outrageous to me. Have you never enjoyed a good book? Ask anyone who has ever sat around a campfire: even the best SFX is no substitute for good, imaginative storytelling! IMHO, Hollywood relies too much generally on technology and other elements and distractions to compensate for weak storytelling. Fortunately or unfortunately, the special effects goose is just about cooked, especially for graphic depiction of violence. You can only blow stuff up so many times and so many ways before it gets boring. That's another talking point for the new movie: the biggest SFX in the original movie were the graphic destruction of a planet (Alderaan) and a big space station (Death Star). Abrams has likewise blown up a planet (Vulcan) and a starship (USS Vengeance) and a city (Starfleet Academy, future downtown San Fran). His MO suggests that something else will be blown up. I would guess that the destruction in this new movie will involve use of Force Power on a grand scale, like to move large objects and cause lots of explosions along the way. And if Luke has been practicing for 30 years to perfect his Jedi powers, including a stint on the Dark Side, then the biggest bad guy may well be Luke. Maybe the movie starts out with that destruction during a dark period in Luke's past, and then someone SIMILAR to the Inquisitor is sent after Luke, living a pastoral life on the familiar Tatooine property that he inherited from his relatives, to bring him to trial: a kind of "Jedi Inquisition." I agree with Catatronic (above) re: the droid ball thing and the speeder resembling a bar of soap. The point would appear to be an indication that the movie will include many similar novelties, likely leading to interesting licensed merchandise...! I can live with the new helmet design for the stormtroopers -- not much choice (!) -- but I have reservations about the rest of the suit, which seems to make the wearer look fat. Militaristic armor should look daunting, not marshmallowy. And there's no denying that the original design is so iconic that they mess with it at their peril. Since this is set in the future, maybe we'll see a little old AND a little new. One hopes. You have to admit that those 88 seconds have given us lots of food for thought! I still think the narrator is Cumberbatch. :D |
^^^
Yes, Hollywood's big movies do like relying on cgi and not story. However I still think it's necessary to have modern special effects in the movie or new audiences might lose interest, attention spans have dropped greatly since the original trilogy came out. Story should come first, but if not then good characters ought to be next on the list of priorities. Guardians of the Galaxy didn't have a great or original story itself, but the characters and their interactions managed to outweigh the cgi. *points to lake* Look out there where nobody finds out whose voice it really is and Cumberbatch can narrate all the trailers you want. *readies pistol*;) |
I won't mention my issue with the lightsaber :P But I do wonder how that round, rolling ball droid keeps his head on? :vader
|
Abrahms is the man who made Star Trek watchable, so I trust whatever he has planned for Star Wars. Plus, after watching this trailer again, I can not wait to see this movie.
|
Quote:
|
Never been a Trek movie fan. TNG and DS9 were great shows though. I could watch them anytime.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
lol
|
|
The light saber makes sense. A lot of swords have hand guards so that the blade of the opponent does not slides down the length of the blade and chop your hands off, so the only effective type of hand guard for a lightsaber blade would need to also be a lightsaber beam. My gripe is not with concept though, but rather with the execution. They could have made it look cooler. Either way though, I know Abrams won't disappoint... that is until he actually does one day. Hopefully, the day Ep. VII is released will not be that day.
|
Quote:
|
This is for Trivial Psychic. Gave me a laugh, anyway. :D
Stephen Colbert explains Star Wars: The Force Awakens’ controversial three-pronged Lightsaber (c/o YouTube) I would have preferred a single blade that resembles flickering torchlight, skipping the crossguard altogether, but that's just me. :D |
I can't wait for this movie..
|
I hope these give fellow Star Wars fans a smile:
Star Wars: Force Awakens Teaser Trailer PARODY ("George Lucas Special Edition") Leaked Filmset Footage: Frankfurt Airport |
|
Modern Lightsaber Battle (parody; ignore annotations)
|
|
STAR WARS VII - THE FORCE IS LOST (Trailer Parody)
|
Really no need to keep bumping this with unrelated stuff.
|
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:18 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin. Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimisation provided by
DragonByte SEO (Pro) -
vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Latest Marvel Discussion |
New Marvel Legends/6" Appreciation Thread |
New Marvel 3.75" Appreciation Thread |
Latest Customs and Fan Art |
XMen |
3D Printed Action Figures with Action Features |
Wolfsbane |
Game of death bruce lee |
DC Creature Commandos The Bride 7" |
Latest Collection Pics |
Spastic for Plastic |
My Mixed Collection |
My Rotating Figure Display |
My Collection/Office Display |
Latest B/S/T |
Marvel Universe est. 2014 |