|
Community Links |
Pictures & Albums |
Members List |
Search Forums |
Tag Search |
Advanced Search |
Go to Page... |
![]() |
It's a sign of the times, in the 45 minutes I was in a Toys R Us, I saw 2 kids in the action figures aisles besides my own boys.... however, there was a constant stream of bearded, grungy 35 year olds going thru the figures and giggling like little girls.
|
I voted no. Why? Because I think if something is not broken...why fix it? The 7' inch scale figures are awesome. Many of the details would be almost entirely lost if the horsemen went down to that size I think. Theyre currently doing fine with offering in-scale vehicles and beasts. Why change it? Let's keep our MOTU Figures ACTION FIGURE sized man...not poop sized. :)
|
HOLY HELL!! I just realized that if we ever got MOTU in 4" could you imagine a NEW Castle Grey Skull or Snake Mountain:eek:
|
Quote:
I used to play a Collectable miniatures game called "Mage Knight" many years ago. In that game they sold highly detailed, yet practical, castle sections in pieces such as the "gatehouse", "main tower", and "wall sections". It was excellent. Why could the same method not be utilized here for the 7 inch MOTU line? I think it could. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Even if the individual components were reasonably priced and loaded with accessories, there's still the issue of buyer commitment. How many collectors are willing to stick with it to complete the set, or would even bother starting? One argument for the introduction of a 1:18th scale MOTU series is that playsets such as Grayskull and Snake Mountain can be done easily within existing price points. Also, that scale doesn't automatically mean detail will be lost. There are some 3.75" out there with tons of detail, like the GL movie toys. Sure, the articulation is utter crap, but the sculpts are quite detailed. And of course, Hasbro's been able to pull off a lot of detail at that scale for years now. If anything, the lack of detail is more of a business decision by Mattel than a design choice. On the other side of the coin, Mattel's in-house designers aren't very good at making 3.75" scale toys (at least ones with details, articulation and accessories combined), and I don't know how many lines in that scale the Four Horsemen have done. But if neither one can deliver on a MOTU line comparable to Marvel Universe or G.I.Joe, then I'd rather they not do it at all. |
If they re-introduced the Masters of the Universe line of toys at retail in the 3.75" scale and a new cartoon in the same vein as the new Thundercats cartoon at the same time, then I think a new Castle Greyskull would also be a given.
I Have The Power! |
Quote:
Plausibility is irrelevant simply because its dictated by individual taste,you could say Admiral Ackbar flying a Spitfire is implausible but i think it would kick ass....compatibility however is extremely relevant,having toys that can "play" with other toys the same size from different lines can only be a good thing for product sales across all those lines.Most kids dont really care about "lines" or "brands" they want what catches their eye in the store, if bony skeleton head guy fits in Anakin's starfighter then its all good in the eyes of a kid,and lets be honest MoTU+TNAoHM are bursting with AWESOME character designs(especially the villainous creatures!!) that kids would snap up!!! Who wouldnt want a mini Trap-Jaw you can fit in your pocket,take to school for playtime battles etc. A whole generation of kids are missing out on these great characters because: A)they are internet exclusives. B)they are waaaaaay too expensive for any kid to just buy. Mattel could easily run the larger exclusive line for adults,and a smaller line for kids,they would just need to be good quality figures released to coincide with re-runs of the MoTU cartoon on Cartoon network. Ps loved that idea for the interchangeable line CLASSIFIED!!! |
I think its a really great idea, just not one that would gel with me. I agree that it would open up a lot of opportunity for some great playsets and vehicles, I think I'm still stuck in 1985 though. I don't think I could wrap my head around it. Mind you if I actually saw them I may well change my mind, I'm sure they'd be some sweet figures.
Do I think it's possible? certainly. I think there's some really great technology for action figures these days. I think it could be done well by some and not so much by others. |
Quote:
I am 100% not impressed with Mattle's tiny bits of crap. I love MOTU, had a buch when I was a kid, but I can't sink my wallet into the high price of that 6" line. A smaller figure and a smaller price would fit my budget a lot better, *IF* Hasbro made them. |
Best thing about 3.75 is less $ which means more figures! I remember when I was a kid, paying >$1.99 for joes.
|
I really want a cheaper, more play friendly, less space consumming way to collect MOTU.
A 3.75" line would be sweet. If they make one I hope it has plenty of oversized beasts, vehicles, playsets, and super springy battle punches. |
I don't know if this has been mentioned in this thread, or another, and if so I am truly sorry, but I stumbled across these little guys while looking at the DC Action League figures and I must say... if Mattle makes these official THEY SHALL BE MINE, opened and played with!! BWA-HA-hA!! Ahem...
Infinite Hollywood: Mini-Masters of the Universe... MAKE THEM MATTEL! |
I'd be all for it if whoever did the MCdonalds he-man happy meal ones did it and they had better accessories.
Those were some badass 3.75'' he-man figures except for the lack of articulation but for happy meal toys that was just whoa. |
Quote:
I would love to own these little guys! |
Quote:
Are those big enough to fit a spring into the waist? |
I'd go for smaller MOTU figures in a heartbeat. I'm all about figures that are 1) smaller and take up less space and 2) slightly cheaper figures!
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
1.) I dont think Mattel could pull it off well. 2.) Durability is always a concern to me with turd-sized figures. 3.) I feel that much of the sculpting done by the horsemen would be wasted in that scale. 4.) You think the figs sell out quick now? If their prices dropped by even $5 bucks on Matty they would be gone WAAAY faster. 5.) I LEKEM BIIIIG DAMMIT! |
I'd love it- but only if they get the proportions correct- none of that MOTU "legs too short" crap.
|
Quote:
Plus, I envision a 3.75" line as being aimed at kids and therefore sold at retail. Having a seperate kid friendly line doesn't mean classics goes away. Quote:
Just a balls to the wall action figure with the emphasis on the action. Spring loaded waists so taught they could thunder punch an evil Master half way across the room. |
This is Epic!!
He-Man by Ludacris (High Quality) - YouTube |
I voted no. It would be cool but seeing as Mattel isn't on the ball when it comes down to the 3.75''/4'' it'd be pointless. Theirs just don't compare well next to Hasbros' own.
|
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:02 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin. Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimisation provided by
DragonByte SEO (Pro) -
vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Latest Marvel Discussion |
New Marvel Legends/6" Appreciation Thread |
New Marvel 3.75" Appreciation Thread |
The Marvel Universe/3.75 Compatability Thread |
Latest Customs and Fan Art |
Game of death bruce lee |
DC Creature Commandos The Bride 7" |
XMen |
Custom Avengers |
DC The Creeper - ML Style Custom |
Latest Collection Pics |
Spastic for Plastic |
My Rotating Figure Display |
My Mixed Collection |
My Collection/Office Display |