[Greenskar]

Quote:

Originally Posted by Crazy Jetty

I guess it's difference of opinion on that part, because I honestly fail completely to see how a scene is better if Wolverine or Deadpool ran someone through with their blades, and was sprayed down with an unrealistic fountain of blood, than it would be if the scene lacked said gorey fountain.

Wolvie/'Pool stuck dude. Dude drops dead. One way has blood an is rated r, one does not and is rated pg-13. I just fail to see why one is better than the other.

How 'bout realism? While a fountain of blood is an exacerbation, I've been unfortunate enough to witness stabbings in my youth (damn barrios), and ya know what? They don't just drop dead, and there's a whole lot of blood. Who knew sharp things drew blood, huh? It also puts in perspective the famous wolverine quote "best there is at what I do..." really isn't very nice. Its NOT clean and its NOT funny and yaaaay wolvie's my hero to all little kids out there who adore a guy who fights with 3 foot long blades on each hand.

The very things that are making wolverine such a watered down character are these same elements you yourself have complained about. He gets away with murder and no consequences. Well paint the real horrifying freakin picture of what he actually does and now lets see how people respond.

Killing is horrifying. Watering it down and calling it heroic is what I think makes these movies crappy. Me, I have a deranged desire to see such carnage a d this would also just make the movie more fun for me. But I stand by my belief that making things like slicing through a guy with 3 foot long blades gory because its pretty damn messy and should be depicted as such.