Integration

TheBlueMarvel · 10-01-2017, 01:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AFU

FYI, Vitage wave up for pre order on EBay...Snagged Iroman because did not like the bell bottoms on the previous version of the figure...

lol bell-bottoms....exactly the reason I want this new Iron Man. Although the big boots of the previous version are comic accurate, the armor was quickly (Marvel likely responding to feedback) refined by Tony to feature these smaller more streamlined boots.

@Dark

Yes, I'm referring to the same one you are. Too big? Nah, man...not in my opinion. It may be a little too cut, or vascular. People often make the mistake of thinking being ripped equates to mass. Tyson had 'boulder shoulders' and at least 17-18 inch arms. He was built like a damn fire-hydrant and didn't look smaller despite standing in front of much taller, much larger men...he was very stocky with an unusually broad back. That fig (again IMO) doesn't convey much of that. The face is good...

Where are you seeing it? I typed in 1:12, but maybe, because it's new, I'm seeing stock images of the 1:6...

EDIT: LOL...just found it on their FB page. Yup, way too big. He looks like a cartoon...

10-01-2017, 01:12 PM	#33764
TheBlueMarvel MarvelLegends/DCUniverse Join Date: Feb 2013 Location: On the metaphysical plane of celestial BOOM BAP! Posts: 6,021	Quote: Originally Posted by AFU FYI, Vitage wave up for pre order on EBay...Snagged Iroman because did not like the bell bottoms on the previous version of the figure... lol bell-bottoms....exactly the reason I want this new Iron Man. Although the big boots of the previous version are comic accurate, the armor was quickly (Marvel likely responding to feedback) refined by Tony to feature these smaller more streamlined boots. @Dark Yes, I'm referring to the same one you are. Too big? Nah, man...not in my opinion. It may be a little too cut, or vascular. People often make the mistake of thinking being ripped equates to mass. Tyson had 'boulder shoulders' and at least 17-18 inch arms. He was built like a damn fire-hydrant and didn't look smaller despite standing in front of much taller, much larger men...he was very stocky with an unusually broad back. That fig (again IMO) doesn't convey much of that. The face is good... Where are you seeing it? I typed in 1:12, but maybe, because it's new, I'm seeing stock images of the 1:6... EDIT: LOL...just found it on their FB page. Yup, way too big. He looks like a cartoon... Last edited by TheBlueMarvel; 10-01-2017 at 01:25 PM..