[Sataninjaku]

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheBlueMarvel

I wouldn't worry about a wall of text, these pages are unending and, after all, this type of conversation is the reason they exist. There's no text limit and Arkers can always make a choice not to read. I actually think it's exactly this sort of dialogue that is most valuable to manufactures, as it goes far beyond the 'this shit sux'; a largely empty statement devoid of actionable information.

I also wouldn't characterize this conversation as contentious given others I've been in here and disagreement rarely rises to - "we're not cool, now" - we're just hashing out our thoughts.

Your reasoning is perfectly sound, thanks for taking the time to express your ideas. I'd only add that I believe it'd require you to either make that or be involved on the planning side of development to see those great suggestions realized in a Rancor toy. Also, I'm not a toy-smith, but I sincerely believe what you're suggesting would cost even more to produce, even in a limited run like Haslab's.

Maybe were are talking past one another. My response to you previously (and now), similar to many of the dialogues featured on any of these threads, was part direct-line communication and partly an address of everything related that came before. Both generalized and specific, simultaneously. I don't attribute all of the comments made here to you, but when you describe a design choice as ugly, one that I can see working for others since it works for me, it leads me to associate that phrasing in a particular way, even if you didn't specifically express all of what I'm addressing. Conversely, I won't offer much of a defensive stance about the suggestion that I offhandedly dismissed valid criticisms despite my having said that there are things to complain about with this Haslab.

I did truly enjoy reading your thoughtful break down and think I'd like your Rancor as well. However, it does make me wonder how you would feel or respond if you put in all that work and thought and read thread-criticisms that suggested it was askew of a subjective mark, not worth the money, or a phoned in effort.

There is in fact a character limit.

Carry on.