[Snowflakian]

Quote:

Originally Posted by afgoosett

She's still kinda his clone though except not really. They used tissue samples from Wolverine to make an embryo and implanted it into Sarah Kinney. It's kinda like almost like in vitro fertilization. The reason it resulted in the clone being a girl is because the cells from the tissue sample were too far damaged so somehow or another there was no Y chromosome. So kinda think of it like Wolverine was a metaphorical sperm doner rather than her being his clone.

Yup, exactly. It's more akin to the italian doctor that did just that to 'clone' 3 children for a widow in the real world. They literally cloned her dead husband's sperm. She had 2 boys and a girl from it in conjunction with fertility treatments.

Due to the tissue damage, that was the direction Dr. Kinney took, even going so far as to use her own eggcells to avoid offsetting the inventory of the stem-cell like ones they were using for the male cloning attempts. That comes across in the Dr. Rice comment when he confronts her and then makes her be the surrogate parent.

So she is a clone in the broader sense of the definition, but that broader definition also indirectly says all children are clones of their parents, which is why I often disregard it.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jason Abbadon

Good thing too or she'd...well...er...hairy.

Yeah.

No back hair is a good thing.

Definitely xD.

She'd be a hirsute lass. A mini female wendigo with claws and no tail. That'd be nightmare inducing. Thank god the girl I'm seeing doesn't read here. We get in mild arguments about hypocrisy, sexism, and how looks mean everything to the world. So my being grateful X-23 isn't hairy, would get me smacked, just as my slip up about seeing her was largely based on me thinking she's hot got a pillow thrown at my head. It's a mess somedays, but she does have a point that I'm a hypocrite. I'm biased towards aesthetic beauty though I tend to be preachy about how wrong that is.