[Superquad7]

Quote:

Originally Posted by trebleshot

Agreed. I think the first one would have been best served as a one-off cult-classic. While the second one wasn't too bad, the last two sucked eggs.

I'm quite the fan of the second movie, despite how mean-spirited it is. The third movie is pretty horrible, though. However, it's all worth it to see Robo drive a pink Caddy.

Speaking of the third movie, it stands as the lesson to basically leave RoboCop well enough alone. It's the result of not only cutting out the over-the-top stuff from the first film (and arguably the second), but also trying to "franchise the brand". Even with this movie, there's no need to retell the origin story in a new or different way. This generation needs its own "RoboCop" stuff, not the stuff from our generation recycled. I mainly mention that since RoboCop is a commentary of things happening in the '80s. I'm just really concerned about this generation having their own culture since much of it seems to be a recycling of ours instead with little originality.

Quote:

Originally Posted by trebleshot

Not sure about the facial hair, but I believe the hand is due to a plot point within the movie that states there is a law in the US that makes it illegal for robots/androids to kill people. Thus his human "gun" hand.

I kinda figured as such. I can't say I think that's a good idea, though. Again, I'll wait and see how it's explained in the film.

Quote:

Originally Posted by trebleshot

Same, although I might get one of the 1.0 figures just to have a little plastic version of him. It's basically the same thing I've done for the GL, DKR and MoS movie figures. One version of the main character and that's it.

I'm not even doing that.

Quote:

Originally Posted by redx24

i got the head of a black version on a gigoe Roc reactive armor fig. looks better as a soldier witha facy helmet than robo.

Awesome. Show us photos!