[trebleshot]

I kind of miss the horns on Loki, but I understand how they would look ridiculous in "real life." Thor and Odin look pretty good so far. It remains to be seen what they'll look like in action.

Quote:

Originally Posted by firmpulse

that's not entirely accurate. what nolan actually stated in his la times interview was,

"There are a lot of problems with it (shooting with a 3-d camera)... the idea of shooting a whole film through a massive beam-splitter and so forth -- there are enormous compromises. Post-conversion technologies probably, for me, are definitely the future, but really it is up to the audiences what they want to see and how they want to watch their films."

so it seems he sees utilization of post conversion technology as the future of the 3-d medium (for him, anyway). but what i gather from the interview is that he doesn't really care for 3-d at all.

I find it interesting that Michael Bay has been quoted as saying that filming in 3-D doesn't seem to affect his ability to film or his schedule at all and embraces it. Of course this is Mr. "Explosion/Car Chase/Explosion" himself, so take from that what you will.

Personally, I have yet to see a movie that had post-conversion, but I've heard enough complaints about them to be wary. I just hope the remainder of principal photography on Thor keeps the 3-D aspect in mind going forward. Maybe it won't turn out so bad.