[Captain Nash]

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheBlueMarvel

@Nite
@Dark

They didn't kill the Hulk to replace him with Cho. The two are separate characters that can exist together (although I'm not a huge fan of Cho because he represents a stereotype in my eyes)...they killed the Hulk because they are inept and lack vision.

...about Surfer and the potential of re-casting him as a nod to the fluid nature of sexuality and gender...that's been done already with Stardust who is pretty ambiguous, maybe even asexual...a character I'd like to know more about...not to mention Korg and Hiroim's romance. I have no problem with that sort of writing, I actually encourage it because it's more reflective of real life. What I have a problem with is the killing off of characters for effect or lack of vision as to 'what's next' for them. STRONG EDITORIAL LEADERSHIP FOR MARVEL, NOW...this stuff's getting pathetic.

Or just doing it without any real reason. Sorry - going to rant about my gripes with Thor again (I thought her using the Thor name was my only gripe but...). So the original Thor no longer was Thor because he was "not worthy", something that Nick Fury whispered to him to make him realize he wasn't worthy. Did we EVER find out what that actually was? It was like...."we're going to do this story but we dont' want to have any actual logical reason why we're doing it. We just want to talk about the new Thor and neveryoumind the old Thor!"