[Jeddostotle7]

Quote:

Originally Posted by Louise Belcher

Again, you ignore completely my points: 1. Some POSITIVE reviews mentioned those issues but treated them as nothing 2. the fact NOT all figures are bad quailty, doesn't mean the quailty control of this line isn't terrible! This is not as uncommon as you described it! 3. Frozen joints, scrached plastic and terrible painting aren't MINOR issues! 20$ is still quite amount of money and it should refelct the value I am getting for the money! 4. The fact that many people thinks is good doesn't necessarily means it good! Facts aren't determined by the amount of people who agress with them.

Yeah, genuinely scratched plastic, frozen joints, and terrible paint AREN'T minor issues. BUT they aren't as common as you say they are, or the line legitimately would not be as successful as it is. If you specifically listen to negative reviews and fail to listen to also listen to positive reviews in addition to said negative reviews, of course you're gonna think the line is garbage. The genuinely minor issues reviews tend to mention in my experience are slightly loose joints, minor paint blotches that aren't easily seen, lines in costume designs not being painted quite as crisply as one desires, etc. Things like you mention are noted to be significant negatives that harshly impact the review score, but they genuinelu don't come up that often. I agree that facts aren't exactly determined by the amount of people who agree with them, but with a situation like this, where we don't really have any hard numbers and can only rely on anecdotes, the fact that most people enjoy the line overall says something. Also something to take into consideration: there will always be more criticism of something online in proportion to how many people actually dislike it, because for people who otherwise would not feel compelled to leave their thoughts on something, something being bad is going to be more likely to motivate you to comment on it than something being good would, so even if more people liked something than disliked something, most of what you're gonna see online is people disliking it, because the people that liked it weren't bothered to comment on it like people who disliked it are.

I'm done with this argument, as you clearly refuse to ponder that your point of view on this subject might be wrong and formed by lack of experience and selective reports of quality.