Integration

User897 · 01-12-2019, 07:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Heat

Wasn't the queen much smaller? Like, doesn't Ripley hold it in her arms at the end of the film as she falls or is this supposed to be some completely different iteration of it?

The figure, if it is to be scaled with the others, is way too big. In the theatrical cut, Ripley was able to hold it to her chest with her arms and her hand almost fit entirely around its neck. I don't know why NECA went this route, as it is not in keeping with any other set they have done in terms of scale and accuracy. The queen burster had nubs for legs and the arms were barely developed in the film. I really only want the Bambi Burster and I wish it was offered some other way. I may want to fiddle with the Queen Facehugger, but that queen thing will most likely stay in the package. Bambi should have been available by itself with the Queen Facehugger or other accessories.

01-12-2019, 07:58 AM	#8
User897 Join Date: Jun 2012 Posts: 681	Quote: Originally Posted by The Heat Wasn't the queen much smaller? Like, doesn't Ripley hold it in her arms at the end of the film as she falls or is this supposed to be some completely different iteration of it? The figure, if it is to be scaled with the others, is way too big. In the theatrical cut, Ripley was able to hold it to her chest with her arms and her hand almost fit entirely around its neck. I don't know why NECA went this route, as it is not in keeping with any other set they have done in terms of scale and accuracy. The queen burster had nubs for legs and the arms were barely developed in the film. I really only want the Bambi Burster and I wish it was offered some other way. I may want to fiddle with the Queen Facehugger, but that queen thing will most likely stay in the package. Bambi should have been available by itself with the Queen Facehugger or other accessories. Last edited by User897; 01-12-2019 at 08:03 AM..