|
Community Links |
Pictures & Albums |
Members List |
Search Forums |
Tag Search |
Advanced Search |
Go to Page... |
![]() |
Movie Rants
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Uh no. That would be like saying the Adam West Batman is the best version ever.
HOmecoming is easily the best Spidey movie to date and is the most accurate as far as Stan Lee's character goes. It went beyond just being a super hero movie as it was also a slice of life coming to age story. Also, it wouldn't make sense having Peter be an adult in the MCU because that would mean he would have had to have been Spider-Man for years. What they need to do is not fuck this up so that Holland can grow up with the character so he can become a college year's Peter. BTW, both Amazing movies were better than the third Raimi abomination. If for nothing else, for having Emma Stone in it and not Kirsten Dimwit. Oh, and I don't get the hard on people have for Spider-Man 2. DOn't get me wrong, it's a great movie (despite not holding up well these days), but it was inferior to its predecessor. Too much emo Parker, MJ's hair suddenly became more blonde than red, too many Evil Dead screaming scenes, not enough quippage, and Peter unmasked himself in front of Doc Ock. I am so tired of the hero unmasking themselves in front of villains. It was retarded in Batman Returns, it is still retarded. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
Mark Waid's recent run on Black Widow was excellent and there's some cool ideas in "Deadly Origin". Plus, a character like Black Widow could go on an adventure that is totally independent of the Avengers and you could drop it in anywhere in the continuity of the MCU. It could be a more personal story or she could stop a secret plot that endangeres the world but most people have no idea. The spy/espionage angle of Winter Soldier was one of the things people liked about that movie and it's still regarded as one of the better MCU movies. |
Quote:
I hope Art Adams has seen what a real woman looks like since he created that piece of artwork. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Chris Evans has had a bunch of non MCU roles fail miserably at the box office. Nobody will watch a Zoe Saldana film unless she is covered in green makeup or blue CGI. Hollywood had written off RDJ until Iron Man. Not an MCU character, but did anyone care what Ryan Reynolds was doing until Deadpool? Not if you look at his box office receipts. Hugh Jackman couldn't draw unless he was shirtless and waving his metal claws around...but all carry their comic book roles well, and we can't see anyone else in their place. That doesn't mean that these actors and actresses weren't making good or critically acclaimed though...they just can't draw on their name alone. These days, people are less likely to spend their money on a film that is not part of a franchise or a spectacle, especially with all of the other outlets we have now digitally for film. Do I think that a Black Widow movie could make money? Yes. Do I want to see a Black Widow movie though? No. She just hasn't been an intriguing character in the MCU thus far, and honestly, I don't think she is a strong enough character to carry a 2 hour film. Then again, I didn't think Ant Man was either (nor do I think Black Panther is...but we shall see on that one...) so the potential to be pleasantly surprised is there. However the character has been so dry and boring to this point, I'd be skeptical. No one has raved about her portrayal of the character thus far in all of the years she has been doing it, and those that have are either Widow fans who are desperate to see their favorite character represented in any fashion, or are Scar Jo fanboys (or girls) who get off on her husky voice and tight fitting outfits in the films. You also run the risk of relying on Scar Jo's star power alone, which doesn't have a great track record unless she has a strong cast around her. Scar Jo has always been great in a supporting role and has had a lot of success with it. She is not a terrible actress (although "Lucy" was wet garbage on a steaming hot day, and her performance in it was not all that inspiring,) but I don't think she is capable of carrying a film on her own. Let's be realistic here, while Wonder Woman was a step forward for female lead superhero films, and it is apparent that Hollywood wants to jump on that trend with all the female led superhero films being announced on a seemingly daily basis, let's be real...Black Widow IS NOT Wonder Woman. Not even close. |
Quote:
Like I said, why are people so reluctant to give Johansson (or Gadot prior to WW) the benefit of the doubt, but Evans, RDJ etc get cast in leading roles and no one bats an eye? It's your prerogative not to want a Black Widow film, of course. But that's really beside the point. There is obvious demand for one, and there is no real reason to argue that Johannson couldn't carry it, not when Marvel were willing to risk hundreds of millions on unknown actors like Chris Hemsworth and Tom Hiddleston and so forth. It's also untrue to say no one has raved about her performance as Black Widow, people did rave about her in Winter Soldier, and people were furious when she was reduced to one dimensional love interest in AoU and largely inconsequential in CW. I don't even like her as a person, but if Marvel are willing to gamble on Evans/Pratt/Hemsworth/Rudd then arguing for caution when it comes to Johansson leading smacks of sexism more than anything else. Black Widow isn't Wonder Woman no, but so what? Doctor Strange and Thor had less public profile when their films were announced than Black Widow has now thanks to the MCU. |
Quote:
Quote:
And as for Black Widow, she's got a history that is more than just being a spy, she's practically the Russian Cap who went nomad and never went back, that right there is much more interesting to me than some rich dude in a transformer-esque suit crying over his riches for the 4th time. |
Black Widow will not have a movie. She nor the actress is Blockbuster. Can anyone really say she, Scar Jo is a good actress? She is hot trash.
Black Widow is not very interesting. People want these companies to sacrifice millions for the sake of identity politics. Infinity War will be it for comic movies, then the bubble will burst. Too much, too soon. We will see inklings of this inflected in the new Star Wars. Shame movies no longer care about who fits the role. Back in the 90's and 80's, athletic females would seemingly get the action role....now all that be damned. There was this movie with Angie Jolie called "Salt" a few years back, while it had decent moments, Jolie looked terrible. She could barely run...just the wrong actress for the role, but she was caster for her big name. You could have put Susie Q as Wonder Women, and it would do well. The big test will be a part 2 and 3, but as stated, the boom will end sooner than later. |
Anyone who thinks identity politics is a valid criticism of anything isn't worth listening to.
|
I wouldn’t mind a Black Widow film, however, the scale of the MCU would have to drop dramatically. Look at what each film has dealt with in Phase 3, and tell me where Widow could fit in. I think Kevin Feige and team were right to introduce Captain Marvel as their first solo female film. If Phase 4 scales back a bit, drop a Black Widow film in and see what happens, but between Guardians of the Galaxy 3, Spider-Man: Homecoming 2, Doctor Strange 2, Black Panther 2, Captain Marvel 2, New Avengers films, Ant-Man and the Wasp possible third film, the possibility of Disney acquiring 20th Century fox and including the Fantastic 4 and X-Men it’s very hard to see where she could fit in.
|
Quote:
I agree ! Certain characters won't have their own movies due to the fact they just aren't popular enough.... as far as acting talent goes with casting certain stars, well that won't change anytime soon. They want overly attractive people portraying these fictional characters. I recall i got a good laugh when they casted Tom cruise for Jack Reacher. In the actual book Reacher was supposed to be a 6'5 large male Not guy who 5 foot 7 in his late 50s... movies suffer because of casting exactly like this |
Quote:
|
Quote:
However, the problem is all of the Hemsworths just pick terrible movies to be in. They think they can get by on their looks like the douche who was in the Hunger Games series. Hell, there was a movie I believe last year where Chris Hemsworth's entire purpose in the movie was to show off his body to the wife and they did his scenes in slow motion. WTF? As for Ghostbusters, that movie failed because Sony responded to the complaints in a childish manner. They doomed their own film. Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
I don't know what you guys talking about but IMO Chris Hemsworth was hilarious in the new Ghostbuster movie. Rush is also one of my fav movies, but IMO the guy who plays Niki Lauda totally steals that movie away from Hemsworth.
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:33 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin. Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimisation provided by
DragonByte SEO (Pro) -
vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Latest Marvel Discussion |
New Marvel Legends/6" Appreciation Thread |
New Marvel 3.75" Appreciation Thread |
Latest Customs and Fan Art |
XMen |
3D Printed Action Figures with Action Features |
Wolfsbane |
Game of death bruce lee |
DC Creature Commandos The Bride 7" |
Latest Collection Pics |
Spastic for Plastic |
My Mixed Collection |
My Rotating Figure Display |
My Collection/Office Display |
Latest B/S/T |
Marvel Universe est. 2014 |